What is Duckworth-Lewis Method in Cricket?
The Duckworth-Lewis method in cricket is a math formula used for target score calculations in limited overs matches affected by rain. It was originally formulated by English statisticians Tony Lewis and Frank Duckworth and was first implemented in 1997. In 2015, Steve Stern, an Australian academic, updated this formula and, therefore, since then it has been known as the Duckworth-Lewis-Stern (DLS) method.
Contents
Why DLS Formula is Required
It is not always possible to have a day in reserve for limited overs games interrupted by rain. Thus, it is necessary to use a method like DLS to calculate the target scores and make sure the game’s final results are fair. This formula has received quite a few updates and is considered to be a rather accurate method.
Because of the rain, the amount of Team B’s innings gets limited to 30 overs which means they need to get only 120 to win the game. As a result, team B get an advantage as they need to maintain the run rate through a smaller number of overs, enjoying the benefit of keeping all their wickets in hand. So, the ARR formula favoured the chasing team and was, therefore, biased.
The MPO (Most Productive Overs) Method
During the 1992 World Cup in Australia the MPO method was used. The main principle of this formula was to reduce the target by removing the runs posted by the batting team in their most economical overs. For instance, consider that Team A score 250 runs in 50 overs. Team B’s number of innings is limited to 25 overs due to rain and they have to beat the number of runs scored by Team A in their most productive 25 overs.
Team B are disadvantaged because the best 25 overs they delivered are completely ignored. For example, if Team B bowled 25 maiden overs then they would need to score 250 runs in 25 overs which is not fair. Therefore, Team B get penalised for bowling well. This proves the unfairness of the MPO method towards the team batting first.
The flaws of the formula became infamously clear in the 1992 World Cup semifinal match between South Africa and England. South Africa was chasing England’s 252 and required 22 in 13 deliveries when the rain stopped the game for a few minutes. The umpires determined the two lowest-scoring overs by South Africa that totaled 1 run. This was rather absurd as South Africa had 21 runs off just one ball. Such unfair result inspired the cricketing society to find a more accurate method.
WhatWhat is the DLS Method?
ARR and MPO methods do not consider the wickets in hand of the chasing team. The DLS formula addresses this concern and takes both overs and wickets into account, considering these factors for the target score calculation.
How How does DLS Work?
DLS formula calculates the number of runs a team would have scored if both sides had had equal resources (overs and wickets). The following formula is used to calculate a targe: The chasing side’s (Team B) par score = The first-batting side’s (Team A) score x (Team B’s resources/Team A’s resources). During international cricket games, a computer program is used to obtain the resource values.
How does DLS Work?
DLS formula calculates the number of runs a team would have scored if both sides had had equal resources (overs and wickets). The following formula is used to calculate a targe: The chasing side’s (Team B) par score = The first-batting side’s (Team A) score x (Team B’s resources/Team A’s resources). During international cricket games, a computer program is used to obtain the resource values.The DLS formula also considers the possibility that a team batting before the match was interrupted might have scored more aggressively if they had known beforehand that the game would be stopped. However, the method’s weightage of wickets and overs is still not perfect because it cannot qualitatively estimate individual batting skills.
It was supposed for a long while that in the original D-L formula, it would be smart for a team chasing a big total to keep wickets in hand, if it was clear that the rain was about to start even if it led to scoring at a lesser rate. In this regard, the method was readjusted by Steve Stern to reflect changing scenarios is high-scoring T20s and one-day games.
How to CalculaHow to Calculate the score with DLS Method
a is based on the rule that a batting side possesses two resources when beginning their ODI innings: 10 wickets and 300 balls. During the innings, there is an ongoing constant depletion of the resources the amount of which eventually reaches zero when a team loses all their wickets or plays out all 300 deliveries.
If the rain interrupts the match, the batting side loses deliveries, thus, they will be unable to use their resources in full. The DLS method, therefore, revises targets in a manner proportional to the resources’ amount available to each side.
The rate of resource depletion isn’t consistent throughout the overs and varies based on ODI scoring patterns which are calculated by analysing games over many years. The resources wasted because of an interruption depend on:
- Wickets in hand at the moment of interruption
- Innings stage when there are lost overs
- Number of lost overs
Duckworth-LewisDuckworth-Lewis Formula
ers lost in the final phases of an innings will affect the batting side more than the overs lost earlier. The reason is that the final overs are typically more productive and it is also more difficult to recalibrate the target in the later stages of the innings. For instance, a side that has lost 2 wickets after 25 overs will be better off compared to a team that has wasted 6 wickets at that stage.
The team that is two down can, thus, capitalise better on the last 25 overs compared to the side that has lost six wickets. However, the formula cannot consider the abilities of the dismissed batsmen and those who are yet to bat.
Importance of HaviImportance of Having Wickets in Hand
asis on the number of wickets a team has in hand at the time of interruption. This reflects the idea that the side that has lost just three wickets after 42 overs is bound to make a bigger score compared to the side that has lost eight wickets.
Difference betweenDifference between Target Score and Par Score
/strong> is a number of runs that the chasing side should have obtained – when they lack ‘X’ wickets – by the moment the match was interrupted. Target score is the revised number of runs that a team needs to get after the game interruption. Shortly, the par score is calculated before the match gets interrupted, while the target score is calculated after the interruption. The par score changes based on the number of lost wickets, whereas the target score is a fixed number.
DLS Method AlternativeDLS Method Alternative
400;">Indian engineer V. Jayadevan created an alternative method to the DLS in 2001. Although this formula was not approved by the ICC, it is used in domestic cricket matches in India. Jayadevan says that the result of this method are superior to those obtained by the DLS formula, which, according to him, does statistically inconsistent calculations.
Difference between Target Score and Par Score
/strong> is a number of runs that the chasing side should have obtained – when they lack ‘X’ wickets – by the moment the match was interrupted. Target score is the revised number of runs that a team needs to get after the game interruption. Shortly, the par score is calculated before the match gets interrupted, while the target score is calculated after the interruption. The par score changes based on the number of lost wickets, whereas the target score is a fixed number.DLS Method AlternativeDLS Method Alternative
400;">Indian engineer V. Jayadevan created an alternative method to the DLS in 2001. Although this formula was not approved by the ICC, it is used in domestic cricket matches in India. Jayadevan says that the result of this method are superior to those obtained by the DLS formula, which, according to him, does statistically inconsistent calculations.
Back in 2003 when T20 cricket was first played, nobody knew what to expect from it. It was not like a Test match or a One-Day International. It came to be known as the slam-bang version of the game. And this slam-bang version of the game had slightly different rules. Unlike in Test cricket […]
There are many deliveries in cricket that a batsman may find hard to deal with. A bouncer figures among such deliveries, as does an in-swinging ball or a googly that a batsman may not be able to read. However, there’s one ball most batsmen usually struggle to negotiate. That’s a yorker! What Is a […]
In cricket, as the current Laws specify, an over is defined as a set of six legitimate balls delivered by a bowler. A no-ball or a wide delivered by a bowler is considered illegitimate and is not considered in the six-ball count of an over with the bowler obliged to bowl another delivery instead. In […]
It is a terrible experience for a batsman to get out without scoring a single run in an innings aka scoring a duck. Not only does the batsman not get another chance to bat in the innings but it also feels terribly embarrassed to not having added even a single run to the team’s […]
Test cricket is the oldest format in the history of the game. It was 15 March 1877 that a Test cricket event first took place. Australia and England played the first-ever Test match at the Melbourne Cricket Ground (MCG). Today, more than 143 years since the first-ever Test match, we would like to take […]
Fielding restrictions have existed in cricket since the 1996 World Cup. The ICC introduced the term “powerplay” only in 2005. The rationale for fielding restrictions was based on motivating batsmen to score more runs. It can be noticed that ODI batting teams have been making more runs on average since 1996 than in the period […]